Archive for the ‘Documentaries’ Category

Vanishing of the Bees 2010 Documentary

“The bee is more honored than other animals, not because she labors, but because she labors for others.” – Saint John Chrysostom

Colony Collapse Disorder is the canary in the coal mine of our food supply system. Are we going to listen to this grave warning? Seed and Chemical companies control food production and government subsidies.

“We’re in a war somewhat and we’re going to lose a percentage of our troops consistently. We’re going to keep fighting.” – David Mendez Beekeeper 7,000 hives from Fort Myers, Florida

“Only when the last tree has died and the last river been poisoned and the last fish been caught will we realize we cannot eat money.” – Cree Indian Proverb

“Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. This is the interrelated structure of reality.” – Martin Luther King, Jr.

“It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure.” – Albert Einstein

CODE ON PESTICIDES URGED FOR NATION By PHILIP SHABECOFF, Special to the New York Times Published: May 21, 1987

The nation’s food supply is inadequately protected from cancer-causing pesticides, according to a report issued today by the National Academy of Sciences.

The report, requested by the Environmental Protection Agency, found that a ”crazy-quilt” of laws and regulations governing allowable residues of carcinogenic insecticides, herbicides and fungicides was permitting relatively high levels of some of these chemicals on or in foods reaching the consumer.

It did not attempt to describe the probable risk of cancer caused by these levels, but it recommended that the Government adopt a new uniform standard for residues of new and old pesticides on both fresh and processed foods. It recommended allowing a ”negligible” risk of no more than one cancer case per million people over a lifetime of exposure, saying that such a standard could reduce dietary cancer risks from pesticides by 98 percent. Impact on Regulation

Carrying out the report’s recommendations would require policy changes by the E.P.A. and probably in some cases changes in the laws governing pesticides. John A. Moore, the E.P.A. assistant administrator for pesticides and toxic substances, said that the agency would make careful use of the report’s recommendations, which he said were sound and reasonable.

The report is cautiously worded and technical, but the fact that it acknowledges undefined deficiences in protection from cancer-causing substances in foods makes it a potentially explosive document.

Environmental and consumer groups said that the study underestimated the risks because it included only 28 of the 53 chemicals identified by the E.P.A. as possible causes of cancer in human beings that are used on food crops and omitted other factors, including the presence of these pesticides in drinking water.

There was general agreement, however, that the report made a persuasive case for changing the way that pesticides were regulated.

Jeffrey Nedelman, vice president for public affairs of the Grocery Manufacturers of America, an association of food companies, said that his organization endorsed the concept of a single uniform standard allowing a minimum pesticide risk on foods. He noted that the Food and Drug Administration has been following such a procedure in carrying out the law, although its practice has been challenged in court.

Members of the panel that wrote the report, as well as spokesmen for the E.P.A. and industry, emphasized that the numbers used to describe current risks of cancer from pesticides in foods were theoretical ”worst case” estimates and that actual risks to consumers were much lower.

Ray Thornton, president of the University of Arkansas, who is chairman of the committee that prepared the report, emphasized that it ”does not address actual exposure to pesticide residues,” and added: ”Nor does it comment on the safety of individual foods. It does not suggest any change in eating habits.” E.P.A. Request for Report

The National Academy is a private, nonprofit group chartered by Congress. The E.P.A. asked it to prepare the report two years ago. While the report’s findings and recommendations are likely to be debated sharply, they may also provoke changes in the way the nation deals with dangerous chemicals in its food supplies. Last year Congress narrowly failed to pass major changes in the pesticide law and this Congress is currently preparing to try again.

The immediate controversy generated by the report, however, involved the numbers it used to describe the risks of pesticides on food.

The report listed 15 foods, starting with tomatoes, beef and potatoes, that presented the greatest ”worst case” risk of cancer because of the presence of 28 specified chemical pesticides, based on the theoretical worst case estimates. According to these estimates, 8.75 of every 10,000 people eating tomatoes over a theoretical 70-year lifetime will develop cancer from the pesticide residues. For beef the risk is 6.49 cancers per 10,000 people, and for potatoes the risk is 5.21 cases of cancer.

In order, other foods in the list of 15 with the greatest cancer risk are: oranges, lettuce, apples, peaches, pork, wheat, soybeans, beans, carrots, chicken, corn and grapes.

In regulating other cancer hazards, the environmental agency often will permit a risk of no more than one in a million. But agency officials take the view that the law requires them to consider other factors, including the benefits of pesticide use, as well as health risks. ‘Theoretical Maximum Risk’

Mr. Moore emphasized that the numbers of the report represented a ”theoretical maximum risk,” adding, ”Where we do get actual data, the numbers come way down.”

The academy report, Mr. Moore said, shows that while ”the American food supply is wholesome and safe, at the same time, it can be improved.”

Charles J. Carey, president of the National Food Processors Association, an industry group, said, ”In the real world, where we live and operate, the risks reported do not exist.”

”Years of testing by our laboratories and others show conclusively that consumers need not worry about pesticide residues in foods,” the industry spokesman said.

But Lawrie Mott, a senior scientist for the Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental group, said that the report ”graphically illustrates the fundamental problem of pesticides in our food.”

Using the worst-case risk estimates, she said, the number of cancer cases caused by the 28 pesticides in this country is 1.46 million over the 70-year lifetime exposure. But she added that the risk numbers ”significantly understate” the perils of cancer to consumers because many cancer-causing pesticides are not included in the estimates, because contaminated drinking water is not included and because there is a serious lack of adequate information about the health effects of many of the older pesticides that were approved for use before adequate testing methods were developed.

”But the issue is not if the numbers are correct,” she said. ”The issue is how to correct the problem.” Regulation of Pesticides

Pesticides are regulated under both the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act and the Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act. One section of the Food and Drug law, called the Delaney clause, after a former Democratic Representative, James J. Delaney, prohibits any amount of cancer-causing substances in processed foods or raw foods that are to be processed. Chemical pesticides tend to accumulate in processed foods.

But raw foods that are not processed are permitted to contain specific levels of cancer-causing pesticides in cases where economic benefits can be shown. The report found that 45 percent of the nation’s food supply was not subject to regulation under the Delaney clause. It also found that the E.P.A. had failed to impose the restrictions of the clause on pesticides that had been on the market for many years.

Under the law, new chemicals are subject to more stringent regulation than old chemicals. The E.P.A. is retesting the older chemicals and imposing stronger restrictions on them, but the process is very slow and, at the current rate, will not be completed until the next century.

The academy report found that 98 percent of the cancer risk from pesticides came from chemicals registered for use before 1978. It also found that a large proportion of the cancer risk came from chemicals used to kill funguses on crops. Disparity in Impact of Rules

The report argued that the regulatory process as it now exists tended to keep relatively safer new pesticides off the market because of the more stringent requirements.

As an example it cited the case of a new fungicide called Fosetyl Al developed for use on hops. The agency found that residues of the new fungicide had a ”weak” cancer-causing effect that would produce one cancer for every 100 million people exposed over a lifetime and cited the Delaney clause to keep it off the market. But the risks of this fungicide are ”several magnitudes” less than fungicides currently and legally used on hops that presented cancer risks of as high as one in 100,000.

A single uniform standard for all foods that permitted a risk of cancer from pesticides of no more than one in a million would virtually eliminate the dietary risk from the 28 major pesticides, the study contended. Strict enforcement of the Delaney clause for processed food would eliminate only slightly more than half the existing cancer risk because it would not protect raw foods, the report said.

While setting a ”zero risk standard’ prohibiting any cancer-causing substances in any foods could theoretically remove the threat of cancer in the food supply entirely, the disruptive impacts of such a decision could impede efforts to reduce the cancer risk, the report said. Moreover, Mr. Thornton said, ”pesticides are essential to our agricultural productivity” and policies should not be adopted that would ”jeopardize our goal of providing an adequate and economic food supply for the American public.”

Industry officials said that cancer risks from pesticides in foods were much lower than than other cancer risks routinely faced by most people. They cited a recent report by Bruce N. Ames of the University of California at Berkeley, and others, which found that natural cancer-causing agents in foods, such as afflotoxin in peanut butter, presented a much higher risk than pesticides.

But Charles M. Benbrook, executive director of the National Academy’s Board on Agriculture, which oversaw preparation of the report, disputed the conclusions of the Ames report, saying they did not take into account of ”the most recent and complete data.”

The Academy committee that prepared the new report included a total of 17 academic scientists, corporate executives, lawyers and other experts.

To access the archived article click on the link below


Who funds the research in the US? The manufacturers do. The EPA does not do the research. It is submitted to them by the corporations.

Chemical Industry’s Influence at EPA Probed By Lyndsey Layton
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, April 4, 2008

A congressional committee is investigating ties between the chemical industry and expert review panels hired by the Environmental Protection Agency to help it determine safe levels for a variety of chemical compounds.

Rep. John D. Dingell (D-Mich.), chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, and Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.), chairman of the oversight and investigations subcommittee, have demanded documents from the EPA and the American Chemistry Council to probe the roles of nine scientists who are serving on EPA panels or have done so in the past.

The lawmakers sent a letter to the chemical industry Wednesday, expanding a probe that began earlier this month.

“Americans count on sound science to ensure that consumer products are safe,” Dingell said through a spokesman yesterday. “If industry has undue influence over this science, then the public’s health is endangered.”

Dingell and Stupak want to know how much the chemistry council has paid consultants, lawyers, scientists and a scientific journal in efforts to affect public policy.

“I don’t remember the last time Congress investigated a trade association like this,” said Richard Wiles of the Environmental Working Group, which contends that the chemical industry has stacked EPA panels. “Maybe for the first time, we might find out the extent of industry influence. It’s a landmark investigation and has called into question the ethics of the entire industry.”

Tiffany Harrington, a spokeswoman for the chemistry council, said it supports independent scientific research and it will cooperate with the congressional request.

The lawmakers want to know why the EPA allowed the scientists in question to remain on expert panels but removed a public health scientist, Deborah C. Rice, from a panel at the chemistry council’s request.

Rice chaired an EPA panel last year that reviewed safe levels for deca-BDE, a polybrominated diphenyl ether used as a fire retardant in television casings and other electronics. Deca has been found to cause cancer in mice and is a suspected human carcinogen.

As a toxicologist for the state of Maine, Rice testified before the Maine legislature about the health risks associated with deca. Maine and several other states — and this week, the European Union — have since banned the compound.

After Rice’s panel completed its work, Sharon Kneiss, a vice president of the chemistry council, wrote to the EPA and called Rice “a fervent advocate of banning” deca who “has no place in an independent, objective peer review.” The agency informed Rice that it was removing her from the panel, and it expunged her comments from the official record, even removing them from the EPA Web site.

The Chemistry Council “seems to argue that scientific expertise with regard to a particular chemical and its human health effects is a basis for disqualification from a peer review board,” Dingell and Stupak wrote to EPA Administrator Stephen L. Johnson. “This does not seem sensible on its face.”

At the same time, the EPA has allowed at least nine scientists who have received funding from chemical makers or expressed similar opinions about particular chemical compounds to remain on review panels, Dingell and Stupak wrote.

Among those scientists is Dale Sickles, who serves on a panel reviewing acrylamide. He received $93,000 from the manufacturer of the compound and $230,000 from its marketer. “I’ve been totally transparent throughout the process,” Sickles said yesterday.

Four other scientists reached yesterday said that industry funding never influenced their research.

Scientists invited to participate in review panels are asked to disclose any conflicts or perceived conflicts. EPA guidelines say that conflicts do not automatically disqualify an expert but that the agency should make sure the panel has a balance of viewpoints.

Timothy Lyons, an EPA spokesman, said privacy issues prevent the agency from commenting on Rice or the scientists singled out by the congressional investigation. But the agency followed procedures in selecting panel members, he said.

Rice, who has declined to comment, has become a cause celebre among Bush administration critics, who say her case is symbolic of undue industry influence in public health regulation under President Bush.

“This is an administration that has put corporate interests before public health and safety, and ideological zealotry before sound science,” Dingell said. “This disturbing pattern extends to EPA’s peer review panels.”

To access this article click on the link below


Colony Collapse Disorder was also occurring in France. The Beekeepers united, hired a lawyer, filed a class action lawsuit, obtained scientific proof and got results.

“We suspended the use of Gracho (Bayer’s systemic pesticide) because it is our job to protect the environment. After hearing about the losses the beekeepers were suffering, I decided to ban it.” – Sec of Ag of France.

Update – “In regions where new products were not applied to crops the bees bounced back within a year. The future of the bee, like water and energy, will define the ability of man to live on the planet.” – President of Beekeepers Association.

“We cannot change the problem with the same mindset that have caused it. Our mindset has to undergo a great transformation.” – Albert Einstein

For additional information please check out the Vanishing of the Bees website at


Read Full Post »

Sierra Club Chronicles: 9/11 Forgotten Heroes
Airdates: No airdates currently scheduled.

Category: News & Current Affairs
Regions: North America
Topics: Personal Development, Political Institutions / Systems, War / Violent Conflict
9/11 Forgotten Heroes
The terrorist attack on 9/11 was one of our country’s most horrific moments, however, for many, the tragedy continues. At ground zero, many New Yorkers gave everything they had to the search and rescue effort. Told there were no health hazards in the aftermath, many of them have now developed serious health problems.
Soon after 9/11, John Feal, a construction supervisor, and his co-workers started experiencing serious respiratory problems, a condition they now call “The World Trade Center Cough.” Feal spent two months in the hospital last year. Steelworker, Jonathan Sferazo, can’t climb a flight of stairs without doubling over in pain. Paramedic, Marvin Bethea, suffers from permanent sinusitis as well as post traumatic stress and asthma. Also featured is Mike McCormack, the firefighter who found the American flag that had been on the top of the Trade Tower in the rubble.

Hundreds of rescue workers are sick and that number is expected to rise sharply over the next several years. Because of an arbitrary technicality in the law Feal, Sferazo, Bethea and many more search and rescue workers no longer qualify for help from the 9/11 relief fund.

We travel with Feal, Sferazo, McCormack and Bethea as they have one last chance to hold their government accountable. They are banding together to lobby congress – traveling via caravan to Washington DC where Congress is considering an amendment to a bill, the Walsh Amendment, that will set aside $125 million of unspent 911 money to help New York State residence with the current and future 911-related health expenses. If this amendment doesn’t pass, Congress will reclaim this unspent money and John Feal and his friends will be left out in the cold again.

Sierra Club Chronicles
In the planetary struggle to protect the environment, we often forget that this is a war waged every day on neighborhood streets, fishing boats and in firehouses by people fighting to protect their homes, their health and their jobs.
Sierra Club Chronicles, a new monthly television series produced by award winning filmmaker Robert Greenwald’s Brave New Films in association with Sierra Club Productions captures the dramatic efforts of committed individuals across the country working every day to protect the health of their environment and their communities. Molly O’Brien co-executive produces and Richard Ray Pérez serves as director and supervising producer on the series.
For more information about the Chronicles series, visit the Sierra Club TV website.

Just days after September 11, 2001, the Environmental Protection Agency assured the public that there should be no concern about any health hazards associated with exposure to smoke and debris in lower Manhattan.
This disturbing documentary asks whether the EPA’s pronouncement was based on science or politics. Now many of the first-responders who risked their lives within that toxic chemical soup are seriously ill or dying.
Filmmaker Heidi Dehncke-Fisher and producer Bruce Kennedy reveal how 9/11′s latest victims are America’s forgotten heroes.

Read Full Post »

Post Mortem – Death Investigation in America by PBS Frontline, NPR, and ProPublica

Currently, there are no federal standards nor oversight of death investigations in the United States. Why should this matter to you? “It is important to have a quality, competent death investigation system. If you don’t, you run the risk of having an out of control epidemic. You run the risk of not identifying hazards in the community due to toxins or environmental poisons.”

Every day in America, nearly 7,000 people die. And when it happens suddenly, it’s assumed there will be an investigation, like in CSI. But the reality is very different. …In some states, the person who determines how someone died is an elected official. (Some do not require any forensic pathology training just a high school diploma. In one investigation the elected official was legally blind but determining the cause of death for the deceased in his county.)

Dr. ROSS ZUMWALT: It amazes me that such an important aspect of our government as medical legal death investigation doesn’t have to have accreditation. I mean, everything else is accredited. Hospitals are accredited. Barbers are accredited. You would think that a medical legal death investigation system would have to go through a periodic inspection and accreditation. We need a federal or national standard because there’s so much variation between the states.

Competent death investigation not only helps catch criminals but can save thousands of lives. Forensic pathologists identified the anthrax terrorist attack, defective cribs that kill babies, and lethal infectious diseases. It is important to have a quality, competent death investigation system. If you don’t, you run the risk of having an out of control epidemic. You run the risk of not identifying hazards in the community due to toxins or environmental poisons. I think the medical examiner system in any community is a safeguard for that community. It’s going to cost you. It’s going to cost you about $2.25 to $2.50 a person in your community per year, which is probably less than what you pay for a Coca-Cola in a movie theater. And that’s— that’s what at this time roughly the price of a good medical examiner’s office is.

LOWELL BERGMAN: Economists call medical examiners and the autopsies they do a “public good,” like the fire department because autopsies can save lives, as well as solve crimes. But unlike the fire department, there’s little public awareness of their value.

I think many people only get that realization when it actually touches them, when they have a family member who dies violently and they want to know what happened. And if when there are good answers to those questions, people are grateful. If there are not good answers, there’s no place for them to go to get an answer. So they have to take what’s out there.


Feb. 1, 2011

Lowell Bergman

Carl Byker and
Lowell Bergman

ANNOUNCER: Every day in America, nearly 7,000 people die. And when it happens suddenly, it’s assumed there will be an investigation, like in CSI. But the reality is very different.

VICTOR WEEDN, M.D., Asst. Medical Examiner, Maryland: I myself have worked with a single light dangling over my autopsy table.

ANNOUNCER: Death investigators are struggling.

ROSS ZUMWALT, M.D., Chief Medical Investigator, New Mexico: We’ve had to hire a refrigerated truck to store bodies and body parts because we just don’t have enough room in our refrigerator.

ANNOUNCER: In some states, the person who determines how someone died is an elected official.

LOWELL BERGMAN, Correspondent: You’ve been elected how many times?

FRANK MINYARD, M.D., Coroner, Orleans Parish, Louisiana: Ten.

LOWELL BERGMAN: You’re a politician.

Dr. FRANK MINYARD: Oh, don’t call me a politician!

ANNOUNCER: In some places, there are few qualifications.

LOWELL BERGMAN: There was a time when the coroner was blind.

TIM BROWN, Coroner, Marlboro County, South Carolina: Yes, sir, that’s correct.

ANNOUNCER: And there is no national regulation.

CHRIS REYNOLDS, Private Investigator: One pathologist had been arrested for drunk driving on his way to work. He was giving crazy answers about how he thought people died.


LOWELL BERGMAN: The body was found over there?

ANNOUNCER: —FRONTLINE correspondent Lowell Bergman reports with ProPublica and NPR on death investigation in America.

MARCELLA FIERRO, M.D., Fmr. Chief Medical Examiner, Virginia: You call a death an accident or miss a homicide altogether, a murderer goes free. Lots of very bad things happen if death investigation is not carried out competently.

LOWELL BERGMAN, Correspondent: [voice-over] We all die, two and a half million Americans every year. Sometimes the cause of death is no surprise. Sometimes death comes suddenly from accidents, heart attacks, homicides.

There are medical experts whose job it is to figure out why and how people die. They are called forensic pathologists, or medical examiners, and they perform the post-mortem, the autopsy, your last physical exam.

One of the leading forensic pathologists in America is Dr. Marcella Fierro.

MARCELLA FIERRO, M.D., Fmr. Chief Medical Examiner, Virginia: When I was treating live patients, I spoke with them. And when I have dead patients, I talk to them, too.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [on camera] But they don’t talk back.

Dr. MARCELLA FIERRO: They talk back to me with their physical findings and with their pathology. I ask them, “Tell me your story.”

LOWELL BERGMAN: As you’re cutting them up.

Dr. MARCELLA FIERRO: I don’t think of them as cutting them up. I think of it as examining their tissues, examining their injuries. I do my examination, and they do tell me their story.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [voice-over] Forensic pathologists like Fierro determine what caused the death. Was it natural, an accident, a homicide or a suicide?

Dr. MARCELLA FIERRO: It doesn’t take a great medical mind to figure out someone’s got his head blown off by a shotgun, but it does take special expertise to tell the distance. Is his arm long enough to do it? Is there any other activity going on with his body that would have predisposed him to depression? Does he have marks of defense? That’s pretty sophisticated stuff. You don’t learn that in a week.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [on camera] And if you don’t have training in what to look for and what to test for—

Dr. MARCELLA FIERRO: And what to ask for, so that if a death isn’t recognized as being suspicious, say for violence, and it’s released as a natural death, it’s buried or cremated, whatever the family wishes, never to rise again.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [voice-over] Elite death detectives like Fierro have inspired popular fiction. She’s the model for Kay Scarpetta in the best-selling crime series by Patricia Cornwell.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [on camera] Is that you?

Dr. MARCELLA FIERRO: Is that me? Am I blond, blue-eyed and 105 pounds?

LOWELL BERGMAN: I refuse to comment. [laughter]

[voice-over] But Fierro and many of her colleagues say that the fiction they inspire in novels and on TV shows like CSI have given Americans a false impression.

VINCENT DiMAIO, M.D., Fmr. Chief Medical Examiner, San Antonio, TX: A lot of people see TV and CSI, and they think that’s how it really is. But really, it varies from excellent to absolutely lousy. I mean, when you look at a case as a forensic pathologist and you say, “Oh, oh, there’s no scientific basis for this decision. It’s just complete garbage.” And then you have a family that looks at it and it’s typed on this neat paper and there’s this official seal, and they say, “I guess they know what they’re doing.”

LOWELL BERGMAN: [on camera] And you’re saying they’re producing garbage every day.

Dr. VINCENT DiMAIO: I’m saying in this country, many medical/legal offices are producing garbage, yes.


911 DISPATCHER: Can I help you?

Dr. LOUIS PELFINI: I think my wife took her life!

911 Dispatcher: Where is she?

Dr. LOUIS PELFINI: She’s lying outside. She’s dead!

LOWELL BERGMAN: [voice-over] In Sonoma County, north of San Francisco, a call came in to 911.

Dr. LOUIS PELFINI: Oh, my Lord! I can’t believe she did this!

LOWELL BERGMAN: A husband reported that his wife had committed suicide.

Dr. LOUIS PELFINI: Good God! [weeping]

LOWELL BERGMAN: Chris Reynolds, a private investigator, was brought into the case by the husband’s lawyer.

CHRIS REYNOLDS: Our client found his wife dead, outside. Her face was down, laying in a bucket of water. He rolled her over and started doing CPR and tried to resuscitate her. And usually, when a wife is found dead, the husband is the first suspect. And in this case, that’s what happened.

LOWELL BERGMAN: The county sheriff ordered an autopsy to determine whether or not the death was a homicide. Autopsies in Sonoma County are handled by a private company, the Forensic Medical Group, FMG. The forensic pathologist assigned to perform the autopsy was this man, Dr. Thomas Gill.

CHRIS REYNOLDS: In this case, it was all going to rest on what this forensic pathologist determined was the cause of death.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [on camera] What did he find?

CHRIS REYNOLDS: He characterized it as a textbook case of suffocation. And in the defense world, when you read something like that, you’re like, “Uh-oh,” you know, “we’re done” because when a forensic pathologist makes statements like that, those are very strong words. And so at that point, we better figure out if this guy knows what he’s talking about.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [voice-over] Reynolds began digging into Dr. Gill’s past. He tracked him from Oregon, where Dr. Gill lost his teaching job at a university, all the way to Indianapolis, where Dr. Gill got his first full-time job performing autopsies.

[on camera] So he hadn’t been a forensic pathologist before?


LOWELL BERGMAN: And he goes to Indianapolis, where they let him do autopsies?

CHRIS REYNOLDS: Yes, and a lot of them. He did hundreds and hundreds of autopsies.

I started to focus on Indianapolis, and all of a sudden, my world opened up. He had been arrested and charged with drunk driving on his way to work early in the morning. From there, it was story after story about his incompetence, stories about his failure to make proper diagnoses, deaths of children, which are the most horrible things anybody should ever have to live through, and he was messing those up. And so these families were just ripped apart because he couldn’t figure out what he was doing.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [voice-over] These scandals led to Dr. Gill being fired, and so he headed west to a job in Los Angeles.

CHRIS REYNOLDS: Dr. Gill was failing miserably in Los Angeles. He could not do competent autopsies.

LOWELL BERGMAN: And that’s when Dr. Gill found a job doing autopsies in northern California for the Forensic Medical Group.

CHRIS REYNOLDS: I am still to this day curious as to what they saw in this person that made them reach out and say, “Come work for us, and work on high-profile criminal cases.”

LOWELL BERGMAN: Reynolds and the defense team decided to confront the prosecution with what they had found. The prosecution refused to drop the charges. But they were worried about Dr. Gill, so they secretly began coaching him on how to answer questions about his past and about the autopsy.

COACH: We need to really craft some good responses to these things that we know are going to come.

LOWELL BERGMAN: And they videotaped the sessions.

Dr. THOMAS GILL, Forensic Medical Group: This one I think I really should— I slipped up. I should have—

LOWELL BERGMAN: Once the trial began, the prosecution was forced to reveal the secret videotapes and turn them over to the defense.

Dr. THOMAS GILL: —that there are deficiencies in the autopsy. You know, we have kind of alluded to that, but I can be more specific in that, but—

CHRIS REYNOLDS: And we spent the next several days in amazement. It was the most amazing thing I’ve ever seen. Ever.

Dr. THOMAS GILL: —actually was on the left side back in here. But that’s— that’s one I don’t want to say.

CHRIS REYNOLDS: Dr. Gill was caught on tape lying about his findings, lying about his background, to the point that the government could not go forward and came into court one morning and dismissed all the charges.

LOWELL BERGMAN: But the official record still lists the death as a homicide, leaving the community to wonder what really happened.

[on camera] Is it possible that a guilty man walked?

CHRIS REYNOLDS: Not in my view. There were no classic signs of suffocation. And I think it’s sad that the community is left saying, “Did he or didn’t he?”

LOWELL BERGMAN: Because of an incompetent autopsy.

CHRIS REYNOLDS: Complete incompetence, yes.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [voice-over] A scathing report on the case by the California state bar concluded that the prosecutor was guilty, among other things, of suppression of evidence about Dr. Gill. The prosecutor was suspended from practicing law for four years.

The report went on to describe Dr. Gill as an incompetent pathologist. But there was no suspension for Dr. Gill. He just kept on doing autopsies for the Forensic Medical Group.

The case of Dr. Gill is not unique. A nationwide investigation by FRONTLINE, ProPublica and NPR found there is no federal oversight of death investigators or the offices where they work.

We found that in Massachusetts, they’ve repeatedly lost body parts. In Michigan, they discovered the body of a prominent banker and missed the bullet hole in his neck. In Nebraska, murderers went free because of incompetent autopsies, while in Mississippi, botched autopsies have helped send innocent people to prison for life.

ROSS ZUMWALT, M.D., Chief Medical Investigator, New Mexico: The difference between competent death investigation and incompetent death investigation may be the difference between what side of a state border you’re on. There may be areas where on one side of the border, you have a statewide medical examiner and competent death investigation. The other side of the border may be a small county coroner with few resources and little training in death investigation.

[www.pbs.org: What’s happening where you live?]

LOWELL BERGMAN: In more than 1,300 counties across the country, elected politicians called coroners are in charge of death investigation.

Dr. MARCELLA FIERRO: There are coroners trying to carry out death investigations, but they don’t have the training, they don’t have the money, they don’t have the infrastructure, and they don’t have the skill. I guess you really have to ask yourself, do you want your cause of death and your manner of death to be decided by someone in medicine who has special competency to do that?

LOWELL BERGMAN: [on camera] Or?

Dr. MARCELLA FIERRO: Or take your chances.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [voice-over] Tim Brown graduated from a technical college and then became a building contractor in Marlboro County, South Carolina.

TIM BROWN, Coroner, Marlboro County, South Carolina: [on the phone] I’d like to have an inspection or something for a septic tank.

LOWELL BERGMAN: He is also the elected coroner, which means when someone dies unexpectedly, he decides how it happened.

[on camera] There was a time when the coroner was blind, right?

TIM BROWN: Yes, sir. That— that happened here in Marlboro County. We had Mr. Francis Stanton. He was a blind gentleman.

LOWELL BERGMAN: He was there for what, 40-some years?

TIM BROWN: You know, I don’t really know, but he’d been there for a long time. Yes, sir.

LOWELL BERGMAN: So you got elected and you just sort of, if you will, dove into the subject.

TIM BROWN: Yes, sir. That’s correct. Off the deep end.

I’ve been elected seven times—

LOWELL BERGMAN: [voice-over] Coroner Brown would find himself in the national spotlight after he got a phone call that a body had been found near the state line.

[on camera] And the body was found over there?

TIM BROWN: Yes, sir. Somewhere right in that area, right there. You see where that old log is across?


TIM BROWN: And we didn’t find any identification. We didn’t find a wallet. We didn’t find a watch, a ring, a necklace.


TIM BROWN: Nothing. No, sir.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [voice-over] If the body had been found just a few feet away, the investigation would have been handled by a fully equipped state medical examiner’s office in North Carolina. But the body turned up in South Carolina, so Coroner Brown was in charge.

Like most coroners, Brown does not do autopsies. He had to ship the decomposing body to a private forensic pathologist more than 100 miles away.

JOEL SEXTON, M.D., Forensic pathologist: The autopsy was done outdoors in a old garage behind the hospital. It was sometimes very hot, particularly this time of year, like in August. And recognize that once a body starts decomposing, it’s almost accelerated with heat.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [on camera] So you did this autopsy in the garage.

Dr. JOEL SEXTON: Correct. And then we sent the body back to Tim Brown.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [voice-over] Based on that autopsy, Brown declared the death a homicide. But he faced a dilemma. He did not have a refrigerator in which to store the decomposing body of the unknown victim and he didn’t have the funds to bury the man. And so he had the remains cremated.

CONNIE CHUNG, “CBS EVENING NEWS”: A still developing story here tonight about the father of basketball star Michael Jordan. James Jordan has been missing now for three weeks.

TIM BROWN: A few days after I elected to cremate the body, I was watching the “CBS Evening News.” The father of Michael Jordan was a missing person, and I thought, “Well, that might be my John Doe.”

LOWELL BERGMAN: [on camera] Might be?

TIM BROWN: Might be. Could be. I think I said, “That might be my man.”

LOWELL BERGMAN: [voice-over] Dental records confirmed that the body Tim Brown found was, in fact, Michael Jordan’s father.

CONNIE CHUNG: —will obviously complicate the FBI’s investigation.

LOWELL BERGMAN: Two men were ultimately convicted of the murder, but the Jordan family was left with only ashes to bury, leading to a media outcry that Coroner Brown should not have cremated the body.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [on camera] You made do with the resources that you had?

TIM BROWN: I did. Yes, sir. And I still believe that the decision I made was a professional decision.

LOWELL BERGMAN: Many people say because of this incident, things have changed.

TIM BROWN: Well, it’s directly attributable to this incident. There’s no doubt about that.

LOWELL BERGMAN: Have the qualifications changed for being a coroner?

TIM BROWN: You know, I really can’t speak to that because I’ve kind of been grandfathered in.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [voice-over] Today, coroners in South Carolina have limited access to a refrigeration unit. And there’s a new requirement to be a coroner. You have to have a high school diploma.

[www.pbs.org: How qualified is your coroner?]

VINCENT DiMAIO, M.D., Fmr. Chief Medical Examiner, San Antonio, TX: The major problem in this country is the coroner system, in that, essentially, what you’re doing is electing somebody with no experience. And it’s absurd. How often do you think people go to the polls and say, “I’m going to vote for Mr. Jones because he’s a good coroner”? In some communities, you could run a dead man for coroner and he’d get elected if he was on the right ticket.

LOWELL BERGMAN: I first encountered an elected coroner nearly 20 years ago, when I was reporting a story in New Orleans about crime and violence in the police department. The New Orleans coroner back then was an obstetrician, Dr. Frank Minyard. Twenty years later, “Dr. Jazz,” as he’s known, is still in office, the longest-serving big city coroner in America.

[on camera] It’s not a very large facility.

FRANK MINYARD, M.D., Coroner, Orleans Parish, Louisiana: No. No, it’s not.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [voice-over] During Hurricane Katrina, Coroner Minyard became part of the city’s folklore when he swam through the storm water to get to work.

Dr. FRANK MINYARD: There was 10 feet of water, here where these boats are coming. There I am standing there, and you can see my John Wayne pistol.

LOWELL BERGMAN: Minyard’s exploits helped him win reelection.

[on camera] You’re the elected coroner.


LOWELL BERGMAN: And you’ve been elected how many times?



Dr. FRANK MINYARD: Ten four-year terms.

LOWELL BERGMAN: Well, you’re a politician.

Dr. FRANK MINYARD: Oh, don’t call me a politician! I don’t think I’m a politician, I’m more of a community servant.

LOWELL BERGMAN: But you’re not a forensic pathologist.

Dr. FRANK MINYARD: No, no. No, I was in OB/GYN practice before I became coroner. I have five forensic pathologists who work for me.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [voice-over] But it’s Coroner Minyard who interprets his pathologists’ findings, and he decides whether or not a death is a homicide. And some of those decisions have been very controversial. Take the case of Adolph Archie.

POLICE RADIO: Red alert! Red alert! Officer shot! Officer shot!

LOWELL BERGMAN: Twenty years ago, Adolph Archie fled after killing a police officer.

POLICE DISPATCHER: Suspect is going from La Salle to Chartres on foot.

LOWELL BERGMAN: When the police captured Archie, an ominous message came over the radio.

POLICE RADIO: Kill the [expletive deleted]!

POLICE DISPATCHER: All that’s going on tape, you know.

POLICE RADIO: Kill the [expletive deleted]!

LOWELL BERGMAN: By the next morning, Adolph Archie was dead.

Coroner Minyard’s office performed an autopsy which found that Adolph Archie had a fractured skull, a broken rib, blood in his lungs, lacerated lips and other injuries consistent with what happens when someone is violently beaten to death. But initially, Coroner Minyard left the classification of the death blank, and then said publicly that Archie had died when he fell over backwards by accident.

[on camera] There’s been a long history where you’ve been accused of being biased on the side of the law enforcement.

Dr. FRANK MINYARD: Correct. Yes.

LOWELL BERGMAN: To the point that you had a friend who was an officer involved in one of the more famous incidents—


LOWELL BERGMAN: —Adolph Archie.

Dr. FRANK MINYARD: Adolph Archie.

LOWELL BERGMAN: You wound up getting the police an undetermined cause of death when he was in the custody of the police department.

Dr. FRANK MINYARD: Right. What’s wrong with that?

LOWELL BERGMAN: In a very violent—

Dr. FRANK MINYARD: Yeah. But what’s wrong with that, if it’s the truth?

LOWELL BERGMAN: [voice-over] After an outcry over his calling Archie’s death an accident, Minyard classified it a homicide. But he continued to publicly say it was accidental. With the medical evidence in dispute, no charges were ever filed against the police officers involved.

MARY HOWELL, Civil Rights Attorney: That was kind of a watershed incident in this city. It felt to me like if Adolph Archie could be beat to death, kind of in broad daylight here in front of this whole community, and nothing happened as a result of that, a very powerful and extremely damaging message was sent out to this community— anything goes.

LOWELL BERGMAN: That turned out to be true in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, when the New Orleans police spun out of control. When the body of Henry Glover was found in this burned-out car, evidence pointed to police officers being responsible for his death. But Coroner Minyard did not classify it as a homicide, and so there was no criminal investigation.

[on camera] A burned-up body inside a burned-out car?

Dr. FRANK MINYARD: Well, to begin with—

LOWELL BERGMAN: Behind a police station?

Dr. FRANK MINYARD: OK, look at it that way. Now, look at it from my point of view. We can’t say. There’s no way I can say that that is a homicide. There’s no way of telling how, why this man died.

[www.pbs.org: Watch FRONTLINE’s “Law & Disorder”]

LOWELL BERGMAN: [voice-over] But last year, an extraordinary federal probe found that the death of Henry Glover was, in fact, a homicide and a New Orleans police officer has now been convicted in the killing of Henry Glover.

[on camera] As a result, some in the community perceive that law enforcement has a greater influence over, let’s say, the determination of the classification of death.

Dr. FRANK MINYARD: To that I say [expletive deleted]. The police have nothing to do with my classification. And we have had battles with the police and the district attorney. And we always come out on the— on the— on the “palace of truth.” You got to keep that in the back of your mind, “palace of truth.” The point is, the truth is what we peddle. The truth is what we peddle, and we don’t care who wins and who loses.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [voice-over] But we have found new cases that reveal cracks in Coroner Minyard’s “palace of truth,” like the case of Cayne Miceli. On the morning of January 4, 2009, here at Tulane Medical Center, 43-year-old Cayne Miceli came into the emergency room suffering from a severe asthma attack. When the staff tried to discharge her even though she was still having trouble breathing, Cayne, who had a history of psychiatric problems, resisted, and the hospital called the authorities.

They took her here, to the psychiatric ward of the house of detention, run by the sheriff. Despite her asthma attack, prison staff put her in five-point restraints, a series of straps that bound her flat on her back on the bed in her cell.

According to the house of detention’s own records, Cayne told the staff that she couldn’t breathe. As she struggled, she began to get free. So four guards held her down. Only when they could no longer find a pulse were paramedics called. They rushed Cayne to the hospital. And that’s when her father, Mike, was notified.

MICHAEL MICELI, Father of Cayne Miceli: We got down here as quick as we could. The doctor told us that, you know, there was no hope. And we got together and talked, you know, and decided to take her off the respirator thing. And as soon as they did, she quit breathing right then. And it took about five minutes for her heart to just slowly fade away.

LOWELL BERGMAN: After Cayne died, two of the doctors at the hospital asked to talk to Mike Miceli in private.

MIKE MICELI: We were taken into another room by two of the doctors. They locked the doors. They set us down, looked me straight in the face and said, “Mr. Miceli, you need to have this looked into. This should not have happened. Something’s wrong.”

LOWELL BERGMAN: Cayne Miceli’s body was sent to Coroner Minyard’s office, where they decided to do an autopsy and assigned a veteran pathologist, Dr. Paul McGarry. He’s the same person who performed the autopsy in the death of Adolph Archie and other controversial cases.

In the Miceli case, Dr. McGarry noted needle marks on Cayne’s arm, and despite the fact that tests showed no drugs in her system, he reported to Coroner Minyard that she had died because of drug abuse.

Coroner Minyard classified the death as accidental. To Mike Miceli, that meant one thing.

MIKE MICELI: Cover-up.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [on camera] And so you decided to look into this.

MIKE MICELI: Oh, yeah.

MARY HOWELL, Civil Rights Attorney: How bad was her asthma case?

LOWELL BERGMAN: [voice-over] Miceli turned to veteran civil rights lawyer Mary Howell, who’s been investigating deaths at the hands of the authorities in New Orleans for decades.

MARY HOWELL: They really are downplaying here any of the stuff with asthma.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [on camera] Dr. McGarry, who has worked for Dr. Minyard for many years—


LOWELL BERGMAN: Are his autopsies, his findings, a regular problem that you run into?

MARY HOWELL: Yes. Yes, they are. If I know that Dr. McGarry has done the autopsy, and if I know that it is an in-custody death, I am routinely going to do a second autopsy because the information and the experience that we’ve had dealing with the office here is— is so unreliable. And we have found really shocking things when we’ve done those second autopsies.

LOWELL BERGMAN: You know Mary Howell, right?

Dr. FRANK MINYARD: Oh, yeah.

LOWELL BERGMAN: What she says is that there’s a consistent series of cases, many handled by Dr. McGarry, where second autopsies showed that there was, in fact, a different cause of death than what he had.

Dr. FRANK MINYARD: I have to believe what my pathologists say. I couldn’t do this job if I didn’t believe them point-blank, 100 percent, no questions. But McGarry never has given me a reason, you know, not to believe him.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [voice-over] But we have learned that when Coroner Minyard made that statement to us, he was aware of serious flaws in Dr. McGarry’s work. Mike Miceli exposed one of those flaws by arranging for his daughter’s body to be flown to Alabama so that she could be examined by an independent forensic pathologist Miceli hired, Dr. James Lauridson.

JAMES LAURIDSON, M.D., Fmr. Chief Medical Examiner, Alabama: The medical examiner saw needle puncture marks on her arm and came to the conclusion that this was a drug-related death. But in fact, all of the needle puncture marks were therapeutic— drawing blood, IVs, that sort of thing. And in fact, her cause of death was something completely different, unrelated to any intake of drugs.

As I examined her lungs, it was very clear right away that her lungs and all of the airways were completely filled with mucous. I went ahead and did microscopic examinations of those tissues, and that confirmed the fact that this was a very severe, in fact, fatal case of bronchial asthma.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [on camera] That simple?

Dr. JAMES LAURIDSON: It was that simple.

LOWELL BERGMAN: When you discovered that, in fact, she had been put in five-point restraint as an asthmatic, what was your reaction?

Dr. JAMES LAURIDSON: To put an asthmatic flat and then tie them down during an acute asthma attack is nearly the same as giving them a death sentence. If you’re not going to treat them medically and you lay them back and tie them down, it’s almost a guarantee they’re going to die.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [voice-over] In 2010, Miceli filed a lawsuit against the sheriff and his employees who were allegedly involved in Cayne’s death. He also sued Coroner Minyard’s forensic pathologist, Dr. McGarry.

MARY HOWELL: And you know that they’re now classifying it as natural.

LOWELL BERGMAN: With that lawsuit pending, Coroner Minyard reviewed McGarry’s autopsy and changed the cause of death.

MARY HOWELL: This is what the new death certificate supposedly is going to look like. And even though they misspelled asthma, you know, we know what they’re talking about there.

LOWELL BERGMAN: But the authorities in New Orleans have so far declined to pursue a criminal investigation into the death of Cayne Miceli.

MIKE MICELI: There’s no reason for a family to have to go through this. It seems to me that this pathologist and the coroner are enablers. They find what the sheriff or the police department want them to find.

LOWELL BERGMAN: Despite repeated attempts, Dr. McGarry refused to talk to us.

[on camera] Dr. McGarry? I’m Lowell Bergman. I’ve been trying to talk to you for a couple of days. Would you talk to us? So I take it you don’t have any comment?

[voice-over] After changing the cause of Cayne Miceli’s death, Coroner Minyard has, after 30 years, stopped working with Dr. McGarry.

In addition to the Miceli, Glover and Archie cases, there are others involving law enforcement where an independent autopsy has challenged Coroner Minyard’s findings.

[on camera] That’s what people point to when they say that you’re close to law enforcement, that you’re— because you’re an elected official with some political dues to pay, you’ll help law enforcement when they’re in a jam.

Dr. FRANK MINYARD: Well, we help anybody who’s in a jam, anybody, to a degree. But of course, I wouldn’t break the law helping people. That’s for sure. These things have a way of looking bad, like you are reporting it, you know, but those people you’re talking about just now, I don’t even know who they are.

[www.pbs.org: Discuss on Twitter #PostMortem]

LOWELL BERGMAN: [voice-over] At Coroner Minyard’s request, we gave him a list of the other controversial cases. And then he told us that they were all, quote, “under investigation” and he would not be able to comment on the record.

[on camera] In New Orleans, attorneys there say if there is an autopsy performed involving law enforcement shooting somebody or an in-custody death—

MARCELLA FIERRO, M.D., Fmr. Chief Medical Examiner, Virginia: A police shooting or in-custody—

LOWELL BERGMAN: and the autopsy’s done by the New Orleans coroner’s office and their forensic pathologist, they routinely will get a second autopsy.

Dr. MARCELLA FIERRO: That’s unfortunate because it implies that their cases are not credible. I’ve always thought that particularly in the police shootings and those that are related to law enforcement, that the best friend law enforcement could have would be an objective, honest, straightforward, careful autopsy.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [voice-over] It was because of that perception of bias and other problems that plague death investigation nationally that Dr. Marcella Fierro joined in a recent study by the National Academy of Sciences.

[on camera] Your number one recommendation was abolish coroners.

Dr. MARCELLA FIERRO: And that was not a new recommendation. This was the fourth time a national study has recommended that death investigations should be carried out by doctors, and particularly doctors who have special expertise. This is not a new concept. It’s a question of competency. I’m not anti-coroner, I’m pro-competency!

ROSS ZUMWALT, M.D., Chief Medical Investigator, New Mexico: I’ve been a practicing forensic pathologist for more than 35 years, and I’m still amazed that there are many parts of the country where we don’t have competent death investigation systems.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [voice-over] Dr. Ross Zumwalt of New Mexico was one of the co-authors of the study, which recommended national standards requiring that every office in the country be inspected and accredited.

Dr. ROSS ZUMWALT: It amazes me that such an important aspect of our government as medical legal death investigation doesn’t have to have accreditation. I mean, everything else is accredited. Hospitals are accredited. Barbers are accredited. You would think that a medical legal death investigation system would have to go through a periodic inspection and accreditation. We need a federal or national standard because there’s so much variation between the states.

LOWELL BERGMAN: To meet the new standards, death investigation offices would be run by a medical examiner, not a coroner. But coroners say that many of their offices do an exemplary job, like the one in Las Vegas.

P. MICHAEL MURPHY, Coroner, Clark County, Nevada: I am not concerned as much about who’s running the office as their integrity, their business experience and their abilities.

LOWELL BERGMAN: Murphy’s office in Las Vegas was the model for CSI, and he was the only coroner the National Academy of Sciences invited to testify.

[on camera] The National Academy of Science’s study— you contributed testimony to it.


LOWELL BERGMAN: You support its recommendations?

P. MICHAEL MURPHY: Not in its entirety.

LOWELL BERGMAN: What do you object to?

P. MICHAEL MURPHY: I guess one of the things I’d have to say is the elimination of the coroner office per se. You know, it was a pretty broad stroke— can you do it with a nuclear approach?

LOWELL BERGMAN: A nuclear approach. They want to blow the whole thing up?

P. MICHAEL MURPHY: I think they want to say, Wipe all this out and go this direction. And I’m going to tell you that— I think there’s a Chinese proverb that says, “Be careful what you ask for.” I don’t think the system could function without the coroners at this particular time.

LOWELL BERGMAN: Well, this report— that’s what it’s all about, “Get rid of coroners.”

P. MICHAEL MURPHY: But the first thing you’re going to have to do is make sure you have enough forensic pathologists. And if you don’t have that, I think the system would start to crumble. There’s a huge demand, and there’s very little supply.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [voice-over] It would take at least a thousand forensic pathologists to handle death investigations in this country, but the National Academy of Sciences says there are fewer than half that number practicing today.

VINCENT DiMAIO, M.D., Fmr. Chief Medical Examiner, San Antonio, TX: For many years, the medical/legal systems have been so poorly financed that the salaries were not competitive and the facilities were terrible. There was a survey done a few years ago, and 10 percent of the offices didn’t have X-ray. Now, think about that. They don’t have X-ray. The X-ray is a 19th century device, and medical— these offices didn’t have X-rays? What I’m saying is if you have poor facilities and low pay, you’re not going to attract people.

LOWELL BERGMAN: According to the National Academy study, it will take the support of the federal government to reform death investigations. Currently, the U.S. government provides virtually no funding to either medical examiners or coroners.

VICTOR WEEDN, M.D., Asst. Medical Examiner, Maryland: One of their grants was for one office to get a new refrigerator because their current refrigerator was closed by a belt. You know, that’s how poorly funded. I myself have worked in an office where it was a converted garage with a single light dangling from the— from the roof, a single light bulb over my autopsy table. Without the federal government having a voice for forensic pathology, we have largely been orphaned.

LOWELL BERGMAN: Los Angeles County has one of the busiest and biggest offices in the country. But because they don’t have the resources, they see only a fraction of fatalities.

CRAIG HARVEY, Chief Coroner Investigator, LA County, CA: We deal with approximately 20,000 deaths a year, but that’s only a small percentage of all the deaths in Los Angeles County. There’s probably 60,000, 70,000 deaths a year.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [on camera] So you still only see, at most, one out of three people who die in the county in a given year.


LOWELL BERGMAN: And in fact, there are a lot of homicides going on you don’t know about.

CRAIG HARVEY: Correct. When you only see one in every three cases, the possibility that a homicide’s going to be missed are pretty great. I don’t have the staffing or the funding available to investigate, to respond to all of those deaths. I can barely handle what I have now.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [voice-over] One of the groups whose deaths are least likely to be investigated is also among the most vulnerable, the elderly.

Dr. MARCELLA FIERRO: There’s a tendency to assume because somebody is old that they have died of an old age-related disease, as opposed to something else. But what’s actually killing them? The caution is with the elderly— “Be careful.” They’re not always going to be natural deaths.

LOWELL BERGMAN: On November 6, 2007, Elmore Kittower, age 80, passed away. He had been living here at Silverado, a high-end assisted-living facility in Los Angeles County. According to his death certificate, he stopped breathing, his heart failed, natural causes. No one reported anything was amiss.

CRAIG HARVEY: It’s kind of an honor system. I would love to have the staff available to respond to every nursing home death. They’re fraught with potential misses. But if anything was to go wrong in those facilities, unless somebody says something, there’s a good chance that the case will pass through the system without ever being seen by the coroner.

LOWELL BERGMAN: Mr. Kittower was buried. But the next day, his family received a phone call. The anonymous caller claimed that Mr. Kittower had been beaten by a caregiver at Silverado and the beating resulted in his death. The only way to know if that was true was to exhume the body and perform an autopsy.

ROBIN ALLEN, Dpty. District Attorney, LA County, CA: They found a myriad of injuries. They found bruising on his face, on his chest, bruising on his arms. We actually brought in an expert radiologist, as well, who consults with the coroner’s office. There were 28 separate rib fractures on Mr. Kittower. He had a fracture to his sternum, a fracture to his larynx, and he had crushed toes.

INTERVIEWER: Crushed toes?

ROBIN ALLEN: Yes. And the crushed toes, those aren’t falling injuries. That was a crushing injury, like a brick. The injury to the larynx, that’s not the kind of injury you would get from falling. That’s more likely the injury, according to the coroner, that you’d get if somebody was doing a C-clamp. They were choking you.

LOWELL BERGMAN: Armed with the autopsy results, the district attorney subpoenaed Silverado’s employees, and they revealed what the caregiver, Cesar Ulloa, did to Mr. Kittower.

ROBIN ALLEN: One person, just a few days before his death, saw Mr. Kittower straddled in bed by Mr. Ulloa. They saw him put a blanket or sheet over his head and punch him repeatedly in the upper body and head.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [on camera] What you’re describing, it sounds like supervisors or others must have had some idea of what was going on.

ROBIN ALLEN: I would think that somebody should have known.

LOREN SHOOK, Silverado Senior Living: When we first heard about the likelihood that there— there could have been a problem, we just didn’t believe it. We felt that this particular caregiver was a model caregiver. He was given the “Caregiver of the Month” award.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [voice-over] Loren Shook is the CEO of Silverado.

[on camera] You say you have a medical director on site?


LOWELL BERGMAN: And you have physicians who visit, I guess, the patients.

LOREN SHOOK: We have physicians who visit, and then we have licensed nurses 24 hours, 7 days a week.

LOWELL BERGMAN: Given the kind of care you’re talking about at Silverado, the surveillance of the patient, the fact that, as you say, you have nurses and doctors and a medical director, how could people miss all the injuries to his face, and so on?

LOREN SHOOK: There were not that many outward evidences of— of any kind of injury to Mr. Kittower. He couldn’t speak very well, so he couldn’t tell us his— his story.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [voice-over] Mr. Kittower’s death certificate did not tell his story, either. That’s because the doctor who signed his death certificate wasn’t his physician and never saw his body. That’s legal in California.

[www.pbs.org: Who signs your death certificate?]

CRAIG HARVEY, Chief Coroner Investigator, LA County, CA: Things are getting missed because there’s just either insufficient staff to look at all of them, or the reporting system, the honor system that exists, has broken down.

LOWELL BERGMAN: Only because of that autopsy of Mr. Kittower did the truth emerge, and as a result, Mr. Ulloa was convicted of torture and sentenced to life in prison.

ROBIN ALLEN, Dpty. District Attorney, LA County, CA: If we had not exhumed Mr. Kittower’s body, we could not have done anything. The autopsy led to everything else.

LOWELL BERGMAN: Competent death investigation not only helps catch criminals but can save thousands of lives. Forensic pathologists identified the anthrax terrorist attack, defective cribs that kill babies, and lethal infectious diseases.

ROSS ZUMWALT, M.D., Chief Medical Investigator, New Mexico: It is important to have a quality, competent death investigation system. If you don’t, you run the risk of having an out of control epidemic. You run the risk of not identifying hazards in the community due to toxins or environmental poisons. I think the medical examiner system in any community is a safeguard for that community.

VINCENT DiMAIO, M.D., Fmr. Chief Medical Examiner, San Antonio, TX: It’s going to cost you. It’s going to cost you about $2.25 to $2.50 a person in your community per year, which is probably less than what you pay for a Coca-Cola in a movie theater. And that’s— that’s what at this time roughly the price of a good medical examiner’s office is.

LOWELL BERGMAN: Economists call medical examiners and the autopsies they do a “public good,” like the fire department because autopsies can save lives, as well as solve crimes. But unlike the fire department, there’s little public awareness of their value.

[on camera] I don’t see a drumbeat of popular protest on the nature of death investigations in this country. People aren’t demonstrating, saying that the forensic pathologists or the coroners aren’t doing their job.

Dr. MARCELLA FIERRO: I think many people only get that realization when it actually touches them, when they have a family member who dies violently and they want to know what happened. And if when there are good answers to those questions, people are grateful. If there are not good answers, there’s no place for them to go to get an answer. So they have to take what’s out there.

Dr. THOMAS GILL: This one, I think I really should— I slipped up. I should have done—

LOWELL BERGMAN: [voice-over] Remember Dr. Thomas Gill, who was coached in that murder case in northern California and was called an incompetent pathologist by the state bar? A year after that trial, he left northern California to do autopsies in Kansas City, Missouri.

In Kansas City, Dr. Gill made news again. An independent second autopsy revealed that a man Dr. Gill said committed suicide actually died from an injury sustained in a car accident.

NEWSCASTER: Deputy Medical Examiner Gill told KCTV 5 in March mistakes happen.

Dr. THOMAS GILL: At times, even though we do our best, that new information arises which necessitates an amendment being made.

LOWELL BERGMAN: Eventually, Dr. Gill left Kansas City. And that’s when he made the most surprising move of his career. We found Dr. Gill back in northern California, performing autopsies for the same company he was working for before, the Forensic Medical Group or FMG.

ARNOLD JOSSELSON, M.D., V.P., Forensic Medical Group: He may have had problems in the past. I know he had a problem with drinking. But it— he doesn’t have that problem anymore.

LOWELL BERGMAN: Dr. Arnold Josselson is one of the owners of FMG.

[on camera] You think Dr. Gill’s a competent forensic pathologist.


LOWELL BERGMAN: And you believe he performed well in Sonoma County.


LOWELL BERGMAN: Records show that trial fell apart because he was being coached to create answers in his testimony.

Dr. ARNOLD JOSSELSON: Yes, I’m aware of that.

LOWELL BERGMAN: You haven’t read the state bar report.

Dr. ARNOLD JOSSELSON: No, I haven’t. I didn’t even know there was one.

LOWELL BERGMAN: Did you ever look at those tapes — they’re available — of what was going in that coaching, what the issues were?

Dr. ARNOLD JOSSELSON: I’ve been told what happened, yes.

LOWELL BERGMAN: But you haven’t independently gone to look.

Dr. ARNOLD JOSSELSON: No, I haven’t.

LOWELL BERGMAN: And FMG as an organization hasn’t checked that.


LOWELL BERGMAN: Or the records in Kansas City.

Dr. ARNOLD JOSSELSON: I haven’t checked them.

LOWELL BERGMAN: So he was hired back, but you’re not sure why— I’m trying to get a sense of— from what we’ve had people say to us, is that he not only didn’t tell the truth but he didn’t really know what he was doing.

Dr. ARNOLD JOSSELSON: All I can say is when I’ve observed him and read his reports, he’s very competent. And I think he’s a good forensic pathologist.

LOWELL BERGMAN: At the Forensic Medical Group, do you do quality control? Does someone check your work?

Dr. ARNOLD JOSSELSON: Well, every jurisdiction doesn’t do that. Some of our jurisdictions do that.

LOWELL BERGMAN: Some of the places you work for ask that someone check your work.


LOWELL BERGMAN: But others don’t.


LOWELL BERGMAN: So there’s no standard there, either.

Dr. ARNOLD JOSSELSON: There’s no standard.

LOWELL BERGMAN: If a coroner who has a contract with you decided that they didn’t want Dr. Gill, would you send them somebody else? Is that basically how you operate?

Dr. ARNOLD JOSSELSON: Yeah. He does not go to Sonoma anymore.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [voice-over] But FMG does autopsies in 14 other counties in northern California, and public records allowed us to find Dr. Gill performing autopsies in one of them, Yolo County, near Sacramento.

Though Dr. Gill declined numerous requests for an interview, he sent us a letter saying that since he returned to California, there have been no questions about the quality of his work.

[www.pbs.org: Read the letter]

In northern California, FMG works for elected coroners, who are also the sheriffs. In Yolo County, it’s Ed Prieto.

[on camera] Do you do background checks on the forensic pathologists who come to work here?

ED PRIETO, Sheriff Coroner, Yolo County, CA: We do a background investigation to make sure for criminal activity. If they’ve been involved in any criminal activity, we make sure that their— their qualifications or certifications are valid, that they come with some reference. So yes, we do— we do that.

LOWELL BERGMAN: Because we got the name of Dr. Gill, and he’s had serious problems all over the United States.

Sheriff ED PRIETO: Oh, really?

LOWELL BERGMAN: And in 2006, out of a case that he was involved in in Sonoma County, the state bar concluded— well, they have a whole chapter here. I can give it to you. It says “incompetent pathologist.”

Sheriff ED PRIETO: News to me. I did not know that. And I think you’ve alerted me to something that I— again, I always depend on the experts, and sometimes the experts don’t really give you the right information. So I think this is really— you’ve alerted me to look into this a little bit further.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [voice-over] After that interview, Sheriff Coroner Prieto requested that FMG no longer send Dr. Gill to Yolo County.

Then FMG sent us a letter saying that, “Dr. Gill no longer works for FMG, as there is not the volume of work available to support him as a full-time staff member.” Just before we went to air, Dr. Gill told us he’s looking for a new job.

And remember Dr. Paul McGarry, the forensic pathologist in New Orleans who no longer works for Coroner Minyard? Dr. McGarry never stopped working. He’s been doing autopsies for coroners in nearby Mississippi.

VINCENT DiMAIO, M.D., Fmr. Chief Medical Examiner, San Antonio, TX: You can get a job in a medical examiner’s office, in a coroner’s office, in many areas because the political entity running the office doesn’t care. They have a set amount of money, and they’re going to hire somebody. They’re going to fill the slot. And if the person’s not fully qualified, well, so what.

FRANK MINYARD, M.D., Coroner, Orleans Parish, Louisiana: The problem is the powers to be are satisfied with the services that we give. When the powers to be who control the pocketbook are satisfied with the services you give, you’re not going to get change. Now, the other problem is — and I want you to put this on the screen in big, bold letters — dead people don’t vote. Period. Dead people don’t vote. If dead people voted, I’d be elected governor or president or something.

To watch this critically important program click on the link below.

Read Full Post »

Read Full Post »

Read Full Post »

Read Full Post »

Gasland trailer

Read Full Post »

Read Full Post »

Read Full Post »

The Environmental Management Committee of the Chemical Manufacturers Association is “managing” The Environmental Regulatory Arena Affecting the Chemical Industry

Charles L. Sercu, Chairman
Environmental Management Committee

Presented to the Board of Directors
Chemical Manufacturers Association

September 5, 1979

This is an internal industry document from the PBS documentary, “Trade Secrets.” This was discovered in the Ross Archives and illustrates the origin of chemical industry strategy to combat proposed regulations. This internal document was never released to public but was discovered in a lawsuit. PBS Trade Secrets created a documentary about suppressed health studies by Big oil, chemical and the emerging plastics industries. This was the first time these internal documents were shown to public. There was a strategic plan to withhold important public health information regarding chemicals and chemical exposure. This document details the strategic plan and war declaration against United States newly formed regulatory agency the Environmental Protection Agency. To view the full document click below.

The Environmental Management Committee of the Chemical Manufacturers Association is “managing” The Environmental Regulatory Arena Affecting the Chemical Industry

Gentlemen, this is a campaign that has the dimension and detail of a war. Let me explain.

The Legislature and Regulatory Process (Figure 9) is fairly understood by all of us. Industry’s shortcoming has been IN NOT participating in all of the steps in this process. We must participate at every step, all the time, in this process. page 6

The allowable maleic anhydride plants is proposed to be set at zero under the New Source Performance Standards, forcing a shift away from benzene technology!!” page 8

Gentlemen, this is a campaign that has the dimension and detail of a war. This is a war–not a battle. The dollars expended on offense are token compared to future costs. We must get the bad parts out of the regulations. page 22

The Chemical Manufacturers Association was successful because they united and strategically planned and participated at every step of the legislation and regulatory process. The money they spent paid off.


It was successful at elimination of the proposed benzene emission standard of zero. U.S. Benzene Releases – 4,288,175 Pounds in 2008.

The Environmental Management Committee of the Chemical Manufacturers Association is “managing” The Environmental Regulatory Arena Affecting the Chemical Industry – Complete Report

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »